It's crazy, but it works," said C. E. (Pat) Mueller, director
of recreational sports at the University of Minnesota for
thirty years. "I've seen a lot of sports fads come and
go," said Mueller,an associate professor with a master's
degree in physical education."But this thing is so phenomenal - It's
the exercise of the future.
Rebounding has been around for over fifty years. What's
new is our understanding of rebound exercise as a process
of gravitational force overloading."
Professor Pat Mueller is the one who brought my attention
to the NASA Report published in the Journal of Applied Physiology 49(5):
881-887, 1980, which confirms many of the statements previously
made in the first printing of "The Miracles
of Rebound Exercise". The research was performed by
the Bio mechanical Research Division, NASA-Ames Research
Center, Moffett Field, California, in cooperation with
the Wenner-Gren Research Laboratory, University of Kentucky,Lexington.
The four scientists, A. Bhattacherya, E. P. McCutcheon,
E. Shavartz, and J. E. Greenleaf, secured the assistance
of eight young men between the ages of 19 and 26, requiring
each to walk, jog and run on a treadmill operated at four
different speeds, and then jump on a standard-sized trampoline
at four different heights in order to compare the difference
between the two modes of exercise. Although treadmill running
had been studied many times before, the scientists found
that
". . . measurements of the necessary variables have not
been reported previously for trampoline exercise." A Summary
of that study is found in the back of this book, but there
are a few quotes that seem to fit here.
". . . for similar levels of heart rate and oxygen consumption,the
magnitude of the bio mechanical stimuli is greater with
jumping on a trampoline than with running, a finding that
might help identify acceleration parameters needed for
the design of remedial procedures to avert deconditioning
in persons exposed to weightlessness."
"The external work output at equivalent levels of oxygen
uptake were significantly greater while trampolining than
running. The greatest difference was about 68%. Now, if
you had access to a gasoline that was 68% more efficient
than the gasoline you are using in your automobile right
now at the same price, wouldn't you take advantage of it?
Well, we don't have the gasoline, but it does appear that
we do have the exercise.
It is fitting that NASA should explore trampolining, or,
as we know it now, rebound exercise, because they had a
real need for an exercise breakthrough. They found that
when the astronauts were sent into space, in as little
as fourteen days they lost as much as 15% of their bone
and muscle mass. The space rats didn't do as well. In seven
days, their loss was as much as 40%.
It appears that the cells of the body have a greater ability
to adjust to their environment than we give them credit
for. Without gravity, the cells of the bones and muscles
took it upon themselves to adjust. Strong bones are not
necessary in a zero gravity environment, so the osteocytes
(bone cells) become osteoclasts and began to dissolve bone
mineral from the bones.(Medical doctors know that when
bones are stressed, the bone cells perform osteoblastic
activity by absorbing bone mineral and depositing it in
the bones where they are being stressed.)
Did NASA find their space age exercise? It appears so,
Rebounding appears to be a way of ". . .averting the deconditioning
that occurs during the immobilization of bed rest of space
flight, due to a lack of gravireceptor stimulation(in addition
to other factors). " [Recovering from space flight]". .
.requires an acceleration profile that can be delivered
at a relatively low metabolic cost." Their studies pointed
out that"While trampolining, as long as the G-force remained
below4-G's, the ratio of oxygen consumption compared to
biomechanical conditioning was sometimes more than twice
as efficient as treadmill running."
It is important to note that although this experiment
was performed on a trampoline where the participants were
able to develop a G-force as high as 8-G's, the efficient
use of energy was below 4-G's.That brings up two immediate
questions. 1) What is the maximum G-force that can be developed
on a rebounder? and2) How much G-force can an average person
handle? In other words, is rebounding really safe for the
normal person? We need to call in the United States Air
Force to answer that question. USAF pilots have been pulling
multi-G's ever since it's existence.
N.A.S.A. CONFIRMS IT!
Rebound exercise is The most efficient, effective
form of exercise yet devised by man."
". . . for similar levels of heart rate and oxygen
consumption,the magnitude of the bio mechanical
stimuli is greater with jumping on a trampoline
than with running, a finding that might help identify
acceleration parameters needed for the design of remedial
procedures to avert deconditioning in persons exposed to
weightlessness."
The above statement is one of several made in a scientific
study published in the Journal of Applied Physiology 49(5):881-887,
1980, which confirms many of the statements previously
made in the "Miracles of Rebound Exercise". The research
was performed by the Bio mechanical Research Division,
NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field,California, in
cooperation with the Wenner-Gren Research Laboratory, University
of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
The four scientists, A. Bhattacharya, E.P. McCutcheon,
E.Shvartz, and J.E. Greenleaf, secured the assistance of
eight young men between the ages of 19 and 26 to each walk,
jog,and run on a treadmill which was operated at four different
speeds and then jump on a standard sized trampoline at
four different heights to compare the difference between
the two modes of exercise. Although treadmill running had
been studied many times before, the scientists found that
". . . measurements of the necessary variables have
not been reported previously for trampoline exercise."
The trampoline testing was conducted at least one week
after the treadmill testing.
The six measurements which were taken on all eight of
the subjects were:
1. A pulse before exercising.
2. A pulse immediately after exercising.
3. The amount of oxygen consumed while exercising.
4. The amount of G-force experienced at the ankle while exercising.
5. The amount of G-force experienced at the lower-back while exercising.
6. The amount of G-force experienced at the forehead while exercising.
The pulse was obtained by a battery-powered electro-cardiographic
unit taped to the subject's body which transmitted its
signals to a custom-designed receiver which in turn recorded
the information by electronically writing it on a chart.
The oxygen consumption was measured with a K-meter which
the subject carried on his back.
The G-force experienced by the ankle, back and forehead
of each of the university students was measured by small
sensitive accelerometers which were placed in plexiglass
holders that were taped to the ankle, the small of the
back, and the forehead.
After a thorough medical examination, the healthy students
were issued a pair of shorts and new Nike running shoes
to standardize the conditions to be measured. They were
given familiarization sessions on laboratory procedures,
treadmill running and trampoline jumping to ensure the
exercise techniques would be the same. Each student then
walked or ran four different speeds on the treadmill with
a five to ten minute rest period between runs while the
scientist recorded their statistics and compared them with
previous treadmill studies for accuracy.
A week later, these same athletes returned to bounce on
a trampoline at four different heights with a 5 to 10 minute
rest period in between exercise sessions. Again the scientists
recorded their statistics, only this time, they had no
previous studies to compare them to. Since trampolining
had not been previously studied, the only studies available
were the preliminary studies which began in August of 1977
on passive restrained humans and animals exposed to increasing
frequency and amplitude of vibration forces designed to
increase heart rate and metabolic activity. "These responses
measured by whole-body vibration resemble those
during mild exercise and suggest that perhaps body
vibration could be used in place of exercise."
The results of this study were startling to the scientists
but quite frankly, were expected by us at the "Institute".
Following are some of the results revealed by this team
of scientists from NASA:
1. The G-force measured at the ankle was always
more than twice the G-force measured at the back and
forehead while running on a treadmill.
This helps to explain shin splints and knee problems,especially
when the natural shock absorbing system of the body becomes
so fatigued that it doesn't do its job correctly, thus
throwing added unexpected forces on already tired muscles,ligaments
and tendons, forcing them beyond the point of rupture.
2. While jumping on a trampoline, the G-force
was almost the same at all three points, (ankle, back,
forehead) and well below the rupture threshold of a normal
healthy individual.
This makes it possible to exercise the entire body knowing
that there is no undue pressure applied to part of the
body such as the feet, ankles, and legs, and at the same
time knowing that each part of the body is receiving the
necessary environmental stresses it needs to become stronger
cell by cell.
3. The external work output at equivalent levels
of oxygen uptake were significantly greater while trampolining
than running. The greatest difference was about 68%.
The efficient use of the vertical forces of acceleration
and deceleration to produce internal loading by directly
opposing the gravitational pull develops more bio mechanical
work with less energy expended, thus less oxygen used and
less demand placed on the heart.
4. While trampolining, as long as the G-force
remained below 4-G's, the ratio of oxygen consumption
compared to bio mechanical conditioning was sometimes
more than twice as efficient as treadmill running.
It is important to note that although this experiment
was performed on a trampoline where the participants were
able to develop a G-force as high as 8-G's, the efficient
use of energy was below 4-G's. People involved in rebound
exercise on rebound units have been measured only as high
as 3.5-G's,so that any activity on a rebound unit is more
efficient than treadmill running at any speed.
5. With the G-force the same as or greater than
4-G's " . . there was no significant difference
in the oxygen uptake between the two regimens".
Even when a person is able to develop a force on the trampoline
of more than 4-G's, although it is no more efficient as
far as oxygen consumption than running, it is still much
better on the lower extremities because the cells are still
below their rupture threshold providing a safe way to exercise.
6. " . . averting the deconditioning that occurs during
the immobilization of bed rest or space flight,
due to a lack of gravireceptor stimulation (in
addition to other factors), requires an acceleration
profile that can be delivered at a relatively low metabolic cost.
. .for equivalent metabolic cost, and acceleration profile
from jumping will provide greater stimulito gravireceptors."
This statement verifies the fact that rebound exercise
is an excellent exercise for our senior citizens, those
physically handicapped, those who are recuperating from
an accident or injury, or anyone else who needs exercise
but is hampered by a pre-existing physical condition.